Commercial law dissertation titles

Oberlandesgericht = OLG = Provincial Court of Appeal OLG 1 July 1994, 4 R 161/94. Arts. 4, 7, 25, 35, 36, 38, 39, 46, 49, [translation available] - 1st instance LG Feldkirch 29 March 1994 [affirmed] OLG Innsbruck 26 April 2002, 4 R 58/02i ( Tapping equipment for restaurant case ). Arts. 38, 39, OLG Innsbruck 1 February 2005, 1 R 253/04x. Arts. 8(3), 9(1), 19(1), 25, 39, 73(2), [translation available] - 1st instance LG Innsbruck (GZ 12 Cg 32/02i-22) 6 February 2003 - 2d instance OLG Innsbruck (GZ 1 R 90/03-27) 3 June 2003 - 3d instance OGH 17 December 2003 - 4th instance LG Innsbruck 9 July 2004 - 6th instance OGH 31 August 2005 OLG Innsbruck 18 December 2007, 1 R 273/07t ( Steel bars case ). Arts. 3, 6, 8, 13, 14, 18, 29, [translation available]

The gentle reader must forgive the ALL-CAPS format of the original proposed text (presumably this provision was intended to be read loudly in a New York accent). This proposed uniform provision is intended to (1) assist drafters who wish to choose New York law to govern disputes; (2) reduce litigation over choice-of-law issues; and (3) showcase New York’s “predictable and sensible commercial law” and thereby increase commercial litigation in New York courts. Whether increased commercial litigation in New York’s courts is a desirable goal may be open to debate, but few would object that litigation over sloppily-drafted choice-of-law provisions should be eradicated to the extent possible.

Commercial law dissertation titles

commercial law dissertation titles

Media:

commercial law dissertation titlescommercial law dissertation titlescommercial law dissertation titlescommercial law dissertation titles